your internet filter and webzine


  rants

  
   
home
zine
features
rants
ticklists
guides
music
weblog
games
drugs
shop

email
 
» newsletter
monthly news & updates
 
NME covers
by Anna
 




And how come
it's still alright for male 'artists' to be complete mingers whereas
women have to have looks and talent



Pop quiz. How many laydeez were on the cover of the NME this year? Go on, have a guess. One year, 52 covers: how many of them featured females? Twenty? Ten? Five?

Nah. Two! And both of them were Kelis! And one cover was shared with balding munter of dance Moby! Does this represent a serious commitment to covering non-geezer recording artists, I wonder?

Shyeah, right.

Course, it's not just the NME. The last time a lady graced the cover of Select was way back in September 1999. Q magazine's list of 100 Greatest British Artists featured - count 'em - six women. And it's not even worth mentioning the NME's list of the 20 Most Influential Artists of All Time, because, like, apparently, NO women have ever had any influence EVER.

But, what-EVAH. It's utterly 1991 to whinge about gender bias in the music press, isn't it? And at least they've recruited a few token 'sad-sack suck-up' girlies to their roster of reviewers and writers, right? So what if most music journos seem to be more interested in flicking themselves off to the greasy cleavages of Playboy models in Bloodhound Gang videos than to writing articles dedicated to female rawkers? Nu Sexism: does it matter?

Well, duh. You knew the answer was going to be yes, didn't you? And you're just as bored of reading about this subject as I am about writing it, aren't you? But it's not fucking going away, is it?

Week after week, some minging geezer flaunts his face on the cover of the NME. Month after month, some sub-Stereophonics pap in ugly check shirts is heralded as the greatest thing since the last lot of check-shirted sub-Stereophonics pap.And how come it's still alright for male 'artists' to be complete mingers whereas women have to have looks and talent - with looks being by far the most important. Where are the female Van Morrisons or Shane MacGowans?

Now, to top it all, we have the NME, once the sole preserve of wide-eyed schmindie students and sensitive Smiths fans, rolling over and presenting itself to the sweaty, flabrous tattooed boys of Nu Metal like a bitch in heat. And it ain't funny any more. It never was.

'We'd like to think', wrote Q about their list of 100 Greatest British Albums Ever 'that this list emphasises the multicultural, multi-ethnic, multi-regional aspects of music on these isles'. Well, that's very big of you, boys. How very inclusive and postmodern and so damn 2001 of you. But you forgot something, didn't you?

The multi-gendered aspect.

Sheesh. If you want me, I'll be in the newsagents.

Sobbing.

by Anna


     
top | back to seethru zine
you might also like:

» RECENT RANTS

messenger is a curse

listen - the dotcom boom is over
» CLASSIC RANTS
» trustafarians
» jamie oliver: the case for
» all your base are pissing us off
» poncey crisps
» queen! mum! stumbles!
» shit my dad is online
» more rants


» PERSONAL ATTACKS
» ON SEETHRU TODAY
accidental hedonist
a metropolitan adventure story
south coast diaries
daily weirdo web diary
» POPULAR STUFF
» what's new
» things you swore you'd never do but now are
» napster alternatives
» are you in an 80s action movie?
» mp3s of the week
» 20 Questions Ask Jeeves Can't Answer
» are you a lesbian?
» today's seethrutalk threads

» DAILY



» GAMES














[home] [zine] [music] [weblog] [games] [e-cards] [shop] [talk]
[about us] [what's new] [site manifesto] [email us]

all content © 2002 seethru.co.uk : all the usual rights : hosted by mirahost